Comments on: How to Configure Static Routing on Cisco Router?

By: ravinder

ravinder — Wed, 03 Nov 2021 21:31:33 +0000

the last hope address in this demonstrated commands is wrong,
On R2
R2(config)#ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1 150
R2(config)#ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1 150
R2(config)#ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1 150

R3(config)#ip route 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 150
R3(config)#ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 150
R3(config)#ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 150

By: ChennaiCisco

ChennaiCisco — Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:51:56 +0000

Static Route configuration in packet Tracer with simple topology

By: Jotas

Jotas — Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:41:37 +0000

My corret answer for this example is this:

R1(config)#ip route 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.2 150
R1(config)#ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.2 150

R2(config)#ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1 150
R2(config)#ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1 150

R3(config)#ip route 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 150
R3(config)#ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1 150

For me works, i see pings in all networks.

Any comment??

Thanks

By: Jotas

Jotas — Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:32:56 +0000

Maybe this exercise isn´t right?

If you packet for lan 192.168.10.0 is in R2, your next hop is 10.10.20.1 not 10.10.10.1…
R2(config)#ip route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1 150
Because R1 already have a route to get this network
ip route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.2 150

Any thoughts?

By: Jonas

Jonas — Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:11:33 +0000

I used your technig in my own task, and it worked just fine. Thank you 🙂

By: PAUL Cannizzaro Jr

PAUL Cannizzaro Jr — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:56:23 +0000

Step 1: Configure a recursive static route.
With a recursive static route, the next-hop IP address is specified. Because only the next-hop IP is specified,
the router must perform multiple lookups in the routing table before forwarding packets. To configure
recursive static routes, use the following syntax:
Router(config)# ip route network-address subnet-mask ip-address
a. On the R1 router, configure a static route to the 192.168.1.0 network using the IP address of the Serial
0/0/0 interface of R3 as the next-hop address.Write the command you used in the space provided.
b. View the routing table to verify the new static route entry.
How is this new route listed in the routing table?
From host PC-A, is it possible to ping the host PC-C?
These pings should fail. If the recursive static route is correctly configured, the ping arrives at PC-C. PC-C
sends a ping reply back to PC-A. However, the ping reply is discarded at R3 because R3 does not have a
return route to the 192.168.0.0 network in the routing table.
Step 2: Configure a directly connected static route.
With a directly connected static route, the exit-interface parameter is specified, which allows the router to
resolve a forwarding decision in one lookup. A directly connected static route is typically used with a point-topoint
serial interface. To configure directly connected static routes with an exit interface specified, use the
following syntax:
Router(config)# ip route network-address subnet-mask exit-intf
a. On the R3 router, configure a static route to the 192.168.0.0 network using S0/0/0 as the exit interface.

Router3# config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
Router3(config)# ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2
%Invalid next hop address (it’s this router)

these are the steps I am following where am I going wrong?

By: Don'tknow

Don'tknow — Fri, 10 Nov 2017 05:33:25 +0000

message sending failed

By: devops online training

devops online training — Mon, 14 Aug 2017 05:43:33 +0000

I hadn’t thought of using containers but that’s a great idea. Thanks so much for sharing!

By: Matheus Ragoso

Matheus Ragoso — Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:13:51 +0000

I used default route in R2 and R3, this is wrong?